Ricky Frazer: Because of so much unrest in the world, the strongest country in the world needs someone with experience to control it and deal with it instead of someone who has never even been in the military. We saw first hand what inexperience can do when France handed over Bin Laden to Clinton and he had no idea what to do with a war criminal and they set him free (this is why France wont help us in Iraq) and the rest is history
Kirk Coolbeth: People who volunteer to join the armed services are typically considered more patriotic because they put their lives on the line for their country. Also I haven't heard McCain put much stress on his service at all, rather the media.
Andrew Sinatra: LOL, I meant "trickle down", not "tickle down."
Vickie Sterbenz: Since they had the last eight years to implement their ideas, apparently nothing.
Barton Morfee: Lincoln and Roosevelt weren't living in an age of terrorism. We are and a strong US military is a m! ust...............
Rashad Marecki: torte reform and competition. putting medical services out in the marketplace and letting people who choose to buy insurance shop across state lines for it. If Obama is TRULY interested in reducing waste, he would address these issues.
Ollie Desalvo: My father grew to become right into a below the impression of alcohol, my brother is a below the impression of alcohol and my woman of ten years drank herself to loss of life. All of my adventure of being around drunks is unfavorable. If I have been president i could outlaw alcohol because of the fact of my own reviews. adventure the two reasons one to think of or provide knee-jerk reactions. i think of Senator McCain's reaction to this conflict is a knee-jerk form of reaction. as a replace of making use of his adventure of being a POW to maintain others from going to conflict as a final hotel, he looks to incorporate sending in extra troops to kill his demons from his previous. ! i do no longer preserve that form of thinking or reaction. Sen! ator McCain additionally would not help the vets, he votes against veterans subjects back and back. look it up for your self. adventure does carry judgment, yet that would not inevitably make it sturdy judgment. As we've witnessed with this rather experienced administration....Show more
Olen Penhallurick: I wish I knew this difficult question. But they aren't talking so's I can hear.
Ardell Luy: You are correct on the trickle down. But there has always been a conspiracy between the doctors and drug companies along with the insurance companies. The current system is in failure, we need just need a flat rate health tax and abolish health care insurance all together.
Rosalva Steinmann: I'm still waiting to hear some ideas, but I predict all i'm going to hear are insults, and slander.
Shandi Wedge: First of all you have to realize that Republican opposition to Obama's health care plan has very little to do with health care, it has more to do with Obama. ! The Republicans will fight anything Obama wants to do. It's just a 'general principles' thing. Republicans have a long-standing policy never to cooperate with a Democratic president, even for shared goals, because that only hands the president a victory and validates his presidency. They did this with Clinton and Carter too, and even Kennedy.As for health care, the Republicans see health care just as they see everything else, as an opportunity for corporations to make profit and return on investment. Anything that might hurt the profits of the insurance companies, they will oppose it, they will call it unamerican and 'socialistic'.The seven large corporations that control health care in the US can make more money covering -some- Americans than covering -all-. This is fine with Republicans. Let Americans compete for it! Those who don't get it are those who don't contribute enough to the economy. They don't -deserve- health care. It's not a -right-, you know. 8^PIt! was the Republicans, under President Nixon in the 1970s, that began th! e move towards 'managed care', to allow medicine to be concentrated in HMOs owned by the health insurance companies themselves. There were great savings to be had under this approach, they said. Then during Reagan and the first President Bush's time, there was the idea of medical savings accounts. You would be allowed to put a certain percentage of your money in a special savings account, tax free, in case you ever needed medical care. This idea never caught on because you could have cancer or a heart attack in your 30s that cost well over $100,000 and who could save that much in just a few years?Today their idea is to allow insurance companies to operate across state lines, and to give big tax breaks to insurance corporations. The Republicans have come to the point where the only idea they have for -any- problem is big tax breaks for corporations and more deregulation....Show more
Elli Esaw: Neither Abraham Lincoln or Franklin D. Roosevelt had any and yet they ! are considered two of our greatest presidents by many. So, I'm just wondering, what's the importance?
Hyo Hardell: Do you know for a fact that her statements to herself are false statements?
Ollie Hamiel: Support based on convenience. During the 2000 GOP primary McCain was considered a ppor choice by them. Now he has somehow become their war hero. Errrrr, wasn't John Kerry a war hero?
Elvie Drumgoole: Some people mention "competition." What kind of competition in health care do we need that we don't already have?
Lynn Mctier: She's a piece of work, all right. She'll fit right in with the Bobbie Boxers hanging in the Senate dreaming of a "liberal" paradise.
Aldo Decurtis: Just admit it...you disagree with the Consumer Protection Agency she formed!I see that you are still in the second stage of the grieving process...anger.
Buddy Ardd: OK, Bug, we've been here before, but allow me to reiterate. There is nothing wrong with our health CARE s! ystem, we have the best. Our system allows for innovation, everyone get! s the care they need, and there is twice as many MRI's and CATscans per million people than all of Europe. What is wrong is the idea that everyone needs insurance. This is ridiculous. Unless you're a whiny little girl that has to see the doctor every 2 weeks, insurance is a waste of money. The will of the people? Have you noticed that if you ask the right question, you get a correct polling? The polls show almost 80% of Americans don't want nationalized health insurance, and 67% don't want anything remotely close to what congress is pushing. Didn't you pay attention to the town halls? There have been so many other options presented, but congress stayed focused on government takeover. Hve you heard the democrats say anything else? Republicans offered state line competition, medical savings accounts, catastrophic, tort reform, and clamping down on corruption. Democrats offered government run health insurance with and without the public option. See what I mean... not much on o! ptions. What I don't understand is how the brightest democrats can't come up with anything that doesn't cost hundreds of billions, and how is going to be cheaper to insure 300 million instead of just 15 million? I challenge you to find me 15 million people that were refused care. I bet you can't find a million. And can you find an insurance company that refuse coverage more times then the US government? And finally, besides the only agency allowed by the constitution (the military), find me one agency that operates "deficit nuetral"....Show more
Lester Haschke: that's very funny; you are a comedian 8-)Republicans only care that THEY have insurance; they are not concerned with average Americans
Karl Samiec: unsure if minority status substitute into the figuring out element in being employed in her case, yet she is info that tribal citizenship and enrollment status is significant. She is maximum by utilising no potential an area American, she's basically recycli! ng her kin's Indian blood "lore." by utilising the way this declare isn! 't shown and the genealogical society that claimed to have chanced on a rfile bringing up an ancestor substitute into "Cherokee" could have jumped the gun. as a techniques as a results of fact the Cherokee chief's blood quantum, a minimum of as an enrolled member of the Cherokee united states he can noticeably element to an ancestor that substitute into legitimately affiliated with the tribal united states. Elizabeth Warren can't. the sole element she will element to is "intense cheekbones." The media is reporting that a transcript of an 1894 marriage application listed her GGG grandmother as "Cherokee." besides the shown fact that, the marriage license and certificates are accessible online and that they do no longer make this notation. The geneaological society that made this reference at the instant are announcing it is an "digital transcript" of an application yet they won't be able to produce the unique nor have they been able to quote the source. additionally, this rf! ile could be seen a non-tribal checklist...in fact, it substitute into somebody self-figuring out, or truly, making the declare that his mom substitute into Cherokee. This GGG grandmother in question substitute into O.C. (Smith) Crawford married to John Crawford. She substitute into born in the 1790s and lived her entire lifestyles outdoors of any Cherokee community, substitute into listed as White on census records and had no obvious tribal association. She is likewise in all danger the daughter of Wyatt Smith an early Anglo settler in TN. The declare of her being Cherokee isn't supported by utilising documented info, and the 4/4 (fullblood) status is by utilising no potential supported the two....Show more
Cassondra Vanholland: I hope they're not proposing anything. I don't think this Congress is capable of producing any reform that takes us in the right direction (toward a free market in medicine, rather than toward a more socialized system).I suspect the next Rep! ublican administration (with the support of a Republican Congress) will! propose and pass ObamaCare, portraying it as a "conservative" program (just as Bush did with Medicare Part D, originally part of HillaryCare, which was only opposed by most Democrats for partisan reasons and by a few Republicans who actually have free market principles).I want a true free market system in medicine. I just don't think Congress can pass anything that would take us in that direction. Since the cure is impossible to attain, it is better that Congress do nothing rather than poison our already ill health care system....Show more
Elden Bardach: we are at war right now, so people assume that a president with military experience would be better able to handle a war realistically, like knowing that a dramatic exit would be a bad idea. also, military experience teaches someone things about leadership that are unique to military.
Russ Kiernan: ANOTHER CON LIE . She was listed as part minority long after she got the job at Harvard . Affirmative action h! ad nothing to do with it .Don't you people ever learn ? Maybe you should read a bit further than the Fox headlines ...
Renay Billiar: Nothing but they want to complain
Alonso Crehan: It might have something to do with the wars going on.Lincoln was the Captain of an Illinois Militia company. Roosevelt.Roosevelt couldn't actually serve in the military because of his disability. He did, however, serve as the Assistant Secretary of the Navy....Show more
Cody Petrulis: progressives have no principles...
Lia Argall: You'd think libs would be pissed about that. Too bad they lack principles.
Marna Liddie: For some reason, Russia is still restricting Jewish emigration.
Stephnie Patout: What are they running from?Which countries would accept them?
Mickey Isle: I don't know how you can "pretend" to be a lesbian...
Chadwick Schmelz: Neither did Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton and they both failed miserably as commander in chief !Carter,! had just one mission to perform militarily. This turned into one of t! he biggest failures in modern military history. A mission was set up to have the military move in on Tehran to rescue our embassy hostages. The military mission was so flawed that it self destructed, literally ! A number of members of the detachment were killed and the mission was scuttled.Bill Clinton, in his first military experience bungled it so badly that 18 army rangers were killed because Clinton refused to give them the support they requested in order to survive the mission.This impacted Clinton so badly, that he was never again able to send troops into combat. Because of this, our country, or its interests were attacked on six different occasions, and Clinton never retaliated or did anything to avenge these attacks.A commander in chief with experience would have properly assessed the situation, brought in his joint chiefs of staff, CIA, FBI, Secretary of Defense, and properly planned the proper response, post haste !...Show more
Keneth Mailhot: Only the! ones who can afford health-care should have health-care.
Riley Migl: This Republican feels that the nation's priorities should be the economy and that the healthcare crisis is one that was overexagerated.
Brittanie Zakutney: They have better options and at less cost than the democrats. The Dem's do not want to fix health care but want to control it and the country. Peace
Clinton Quant: I don't think it has anything to do with religion or raceI could be wrong here is a translated link, what do you think about it?http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ru&...
Jodie Capella: There is NO evidence of any kind that she received ANY preferential treatment in school admission or in hiring for her mentioning she had some Native American ancestors. NONE.NONE.
Terrell Lawman: Apparently they embrace liars.They elected Teddy Kennedy how many times?
Seema Hosfeld: The importance on experience is just because without them they will be just an ! average Joe.but here is the real reasons:1. experience means no mistake! s will be made2. lack means you are as dumb as a door knobIf you believe that to be true, then I suggest you to move to Iceland and buy a timeshare on a hotel made out of ice, it is a great investment that surely will pay great dividends. I also have a great position open that requires a lot of energy, wisdom, long hours, ability to lift up to 50 lbs, must work seven days a week, with a contract for four years with possible another four year renewal, the pay is okay and lots of co-workers to mingle with, all lunch and dinners are provided as well as a full tank of gas with no charge. Must be dependable, honest, hardworking, strong personality and able to make quick decisions, language ability a plus, if you can swear in five or more languages then it is really a plus when debating with our commercial allies, please no rings, tattoos, piercings of any kind are acceptable at this time, please name three people for personal references, preference for non smokers and non drink! ers, but it is a must to play golf, swim, jet travel, horse backriding and jogging. Must have a nice smile, short hair, we provide uniforms and you must relinquish all your rights to privacy. Job brings a lot of enemies from outside and also from within, but we offer compensation commensurate with experience and hair color. Only rich people will be considered at this time, sorry for all others.Sounds like a great plan:worse economy of the century....chaos at all levels including security.....privacy out of the door.........no exit out promising....must lie with a smile.........promise what you cannot deliver....I LOVE POLITICS, DONT YOU!!!!!!lololololol...Show more
Ollie Desalvo: Strict FDA regulations that prevent new drugs from reaching the market. Strict regulations that drive up costs in all areas, from medical schools, to clinics and hospitals, to treatments and insurance. Really, the same as the democrats.
Piedad Bassiti: a rattle and some incense
Ra! shad Marecki: I think tort reform is a good idea. I'm sure the mass of ! frivilous lawsuits does drive up the cost. But I have doubts that tort reform is going to bring down the cost for the "little guy." It seems like more "tickle down" economics to me.
Ronny Nowzari: Your butthurt is delicious.
Shandi Wedge: Because they can't talk about the issues, or anything even resembling McCains stances because they are too similar to Bush. The only way they can win this election, and it has been stated many many times by republican campaign strategists, the only way to win this election is to demonize Obama. The only way to win is if they make people so scared of Obama, for ANY reason whatsoever, that they won't vote for him. McCain cannot win based on the issues, the country is in shambles, they know people will realize that McCain will just make things worse, not better, and Obama WILL help things. So, point out his lack of military experience, make McCain look like some kind of hero, and Obama as an un-american, un-patriotic, MUSLIM.And t! he right accuses the left of hate mongering/fear mongering. Obama had to start his own website just to attack all the smears put on him and his family.The right is running an incredibly dirty, and just appalling campaign. I would consider voting for McCain if he kept any of his promises, condemned these attacks against him, like Obama does to people who attack mccain.Does the right even realize how much Obama is praising McCain for his service? And how McCain and his supporters are just attacking Obama left and right with low blows, and completely made up claims? It's no wonder the republican party is in such disarray at this point, they are despicable people....Show more
No comments:
Post a Comment